Xeon W3670 vs E5-2680 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.58
+175%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Xeon W3670 by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon W3670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6911397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.022.17
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency8.802.95
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Gulftown (2010−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)29 August 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745$295

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 39% better value for money than Xeon W3670.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon W3670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2812
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.46 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache448 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size306.18 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C68 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon W3670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon W3670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit36 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon W3670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon W3670 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon W3670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB24 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon W3670.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.58
+175%
Xeon W3670 4.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17724
+175%
Xeon W3670 6449

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 1018
+95.4%
Xeon W3670 521

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 6905
+194%
Xeon W3670 2351

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.58 4.21
Recency 20 June 2016 29 August 2010
Physical cores 14 6
Threads 28 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a 175.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Xeon W3670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Xeon W3670
Xeon W3670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3911 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 43 votes

Rate Xeon W3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Xeon W3670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.