i7-4940MX Extreme Edition vs Xeon E5-2673 V3
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 853 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7EE |
| Power efficiency | 8.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | 8 September 2014 (10 years ago) | 19 January 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 356 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 2011-3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 57 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 September 2014 | 19 January 2014 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 57 Watt |
Xeon E5-2673 V3 has an age advantage of 7 months, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
i7-4940MX Extreme Edition, on the other hand, has 84.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2673 V3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2673 V3 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
