Core i9-14900K vs Xeon E5-2667 v4
Aggregate performance score
i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v4 by a whopping 337% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i9-14900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 816 | 67 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 19.73 | 58.79 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Raptor Lake |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 17 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,057 | $589 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i9-14900K has 198% better value for money than Xeon E5-2667 v4.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i9-14900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 6 GHz |
| Bus support | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 32 MB |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 246.24 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i9-14900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | LGA 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i9-14900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i9-14900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i9-14900K are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i9-14900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i9-14900K.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v4 by 337% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v4 by 337% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v4 by 165% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v4 by 220% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.96 | 39.19 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 17 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 24 |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 125 Watt |
i9-14900K has a 337.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.
The Core i9-14900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2667 v4 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2667 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Core i9-14900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
