Celeron J1800 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking860not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.54no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency6.10no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,057$72

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cacheno data112 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache25 MB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature78 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 13821
+2312%
Celeron J1800 573

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 1 November 2013
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-2667 v4 has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has 1250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2667 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Xeon E5-2667 v4
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1246 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2667 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 530 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2667 v4 or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.