Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2667 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 135 Watt
8.71
+2539%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.33

Xeon E5-2667 v4 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 by a whopping 2539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8673074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.54no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E52x Athlon 64
Power efficiency6.111.01
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Taylor / Hawk-256
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,057no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s667 MHz
Multiplier32no data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache25 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 8.71
+2539%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 0.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2667 v4 13833
+2570%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.71 0.33
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 31 Watt

Xeon E5-2667 v4 has a 2539.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, on the other hand, has 335.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2667 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2667 v4 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Xeon E5-2667 v4
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1279 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2667 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 27 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2667 v4 or Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.