Ryzen 9 7900 vs Xeon E5-2667 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2667 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
7.76
Ryzen 9 7900
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
30.85
+298%

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 by a whopping 298% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Ryzen 9 7900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking949133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0562.22
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.6344.73
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)14 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,300$429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7900 has 5826% better value for money than Xeon E5-2667 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Ryzen 9 7900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size160 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Ryzen 9 7900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Ryzen 9 7900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Ryzen 9 7900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Ryzen 9 7900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Ryzen 9 7900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Ryzen 9 7900.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2667 v2 7.76
Ryzen 9 7900 30.85
+298%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2667 v2 12275
Ryzen 9 7900 48820
+298%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2667 v2 645
Ryzen 9 7900 2857
+343%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2667 v2 4004
Ryzen 9 7900 16837
+321%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.76 30.85
Recency 1 September 2013 14 January 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 9 7900 has a 297.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 340% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2667 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2667 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Ryzen 9 7900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
Xeon E5-2667 v2
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
Ryzen 9 7900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 726 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2667 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 361 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2667 v2 or Ryzen 9 7900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.