i9-14900K vs Xeon E5-2660

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2660
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
5.14
Core i9-14900K
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.79
+635%

Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2660 by a whopping 635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking120980
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.7864.67
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.0928.46
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-14900K has 854% better value for money than Xeon E5-2660.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size435 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size384 GB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2660 5.14
i9-14900K 37.79
+635%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2660 8167
i9-14900K 60024
+635%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2660 457
i9-14900K 3079
+574%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2660 2713
i9-14900K 20636
+661%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.14 37.79
Recency 6 March 2012 17 October 2023
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-2660 has 31.6% lower power consumption.

i9-14900K, on the other hand, has a 635.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i9-14900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2660 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2660 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2660 and Core i9-14900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2660
Xeon E5-2660
Intel Core i9-14900K
Core i9-14900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 138 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1749 votes

Rate Core i9-14900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2660 or Core i9-14900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.