Xeon D-1718T vs E5-2658
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-1718T outperforms Xeon E5-2658 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2658 and Xeon D-1718T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1473 | 1095 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.41 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 3.80 | 12.56 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | no data |
| Release date | 6 March 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,462 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2658 and Xeon D-1718T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 20480 KB (shared) | 10 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 435 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,270 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2658 and Xeon D-1718T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 2011 | FCBGA2227 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 and Xeon D-1718T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2658 and Xeon D-1718T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 and Xeon D-1718T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 and Xeon D-1718T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 and Xeon D-1718T.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.82 | 6.11 |
| Recency | 6 March 2012 | 1 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 46 Watt |
Xeon E5-2658 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Xeon D-1718T, on the other hand, has a 59.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 106.5% lower power consumption.
The Xeon D-1718T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2658 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 and Xeon D-1718T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
