FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-2658

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2658
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
3.82
+46.9%
FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60

Xeon E5-2658 outperforms FX-6300 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14601716
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.410.60
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.812.59
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,462$132

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-6300 has 46% better value for money than Xeon E5-2658.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads166
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 and FX-6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 and FX-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 and FX-6300.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2658 3.82
+46.9%
FX-6300 2.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2658 6073
+46.8%
FX-6300 4137

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.82 2.60
Recency 6 March 2012 23 October 2012
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 6

Xeon E5-2658 has a 46.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

FX-6300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

The Xeon E5-2658 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2658 is a server/workstation processor while FX-6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2658
Xeon E5-2658
AMD FX-6300
FX-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4102 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2658 or FX-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.