Phenom II X3 N850 vs Xeon E5-2658 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2658 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
9.09
+1051%
Phenom II X3 N850
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
0.79

Xeon E5-2658 v4 outperforms Phenom II X3 N850 by a whopping 1051% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Phenom II X3 N850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8482631
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.89no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E53x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency8.192.14
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,832no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Phenom II X3 N850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads283
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s3600 MHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache3.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache35 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Phenom II X3 N850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
Socketno dataS1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Phenom II X3 N850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Phenom II X3 N850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Phenom II X3 N850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Phenom II X3 N850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Phenom II X3 N850.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 9.09
+1051%
Phenom II X3 N850 0.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 14434
+1052%
Phenom II X3 N850 1253

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.09 0.79
Recency 20 June 2016 4 October 2010
Physical cores 14 3
Threads 28 3
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2658 v4 has a 1050.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 366.7% more physical cores and 833.3% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom II X3 N850, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 N850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2658 v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Phenom II X3 N850 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Phenom II X3 N850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2658 v4
Xeon E5-2658 v4
AMD Phenom II X3 N850
Phenom II X3 N850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 30 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2658 v4 or Phenom II X3 N850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.