Core 2 Quad Q9400s vs Xeon E5-2650 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Core 2 Quad Q9400s processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	883	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.58	no data
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Xeon E5	no data
Power efficiency	7.70	no data
Architecture codename	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	18 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,166	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Core 2 Quad Q9400s basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	12 (Dodeca-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	24	4
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.9 GHz	0.67 GHz
Bus type	QPI	no data
Bus rate	2 × 9.6 GT/s	1333 MHz
Multiplier	22	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	3 MB	6 MB (shared)
L3 cache	30 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Die size	306.18 mm2	2x 82 mm2
Maximum core temperature	80 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	76 °C
Number of transistors	4700 Million	456 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	no data	0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Core 2 Quad Q9400s compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Core 2 Quad Q9400s. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	no data
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
TSX	+	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	-
PAE	46 Bit	no data
FSB parity	no data	-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Core 2 Quad Q9400s technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Core 2 Quad Q9400s are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Core 2 Quad Q9400s. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size	1.5 TB	no data
Max memory channels	4	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Core 2 Quad Q9400s.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	40	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	20 June 2016	18 January 2009
Physical cores	12	4
Threads	24	4
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Core 2 Quad Q9400s, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---