Apple M2 vs Xeon E5-2650 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.50
Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.40
+10.6%

Apple M2 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v4 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and M2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking897814
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.59no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Apple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency7.6644.45
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)no data
Release date16 March 2016 (8 years ago)10 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,166no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and M2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.48 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)20 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 million20000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and M2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and M2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and M2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and M2 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and M2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and M2.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 8.50
Apple M2 9.40
+10.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v4 13503
Apple M2 14933
+10.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.50 9.40
Recency 16 March 2016 10 June 2022
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 20 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Apple M2, on the other hand, has a 10.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 425% lower power consumption.

The M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2650 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Apple M2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Apple M2
M2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1687 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 621 vote

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v4 or M2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.