Xeon Gold 6258R vs E5-2650 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v3
2014
10 cores / 20 threads, 105 Watt
7.43
Xeon Gold 6258R
2020
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.34
+241%

Xeon Gold 6258R outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 by a whopping 241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon Gold 6258R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking980200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.90
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency6.6611.64
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)24 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,950

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon Gold 6258R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads2056
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate9.6 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache64K (per core)1.75 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)28 MB
L3 cache25 MB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature79 °C74 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon Gold 6258R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon Gold 6258R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon Gold 6258R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon Gold 6258R are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon Gold 6258R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size768 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon Gold 6258R.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v3 7.43
Xeon Gold 6258R 25.34
+241%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v3 11797
Xeon Gold 6258R 40252
+241%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.43 25.34
Recency 8 September 2014 24 February 2020
Physical cores 10 28
Threads 20 56
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v3 has 95.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6258R, on the other hand, has a 241% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 180% more physical cores and 180% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6258R is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2650 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Xeon Gold 6258R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Intel Xeon Gold 6258R
Xeon Gold 6258R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1172 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6258R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v3 or Xeon Gold 6258R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.