i7-13700K vs Xeon E5-2650 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v3
2014
10 cores / 20 threads, 105 Watt
7.42
Core i7-13700K
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
29.19
+293%

Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 by a whopping 293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking983150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.99
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency6.6922.10
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$409

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2024
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data34
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache25 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size356 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.6 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v3 7.42
i7-13700K 29.19
+293%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v3 11788
i7-13700K 46366
+293%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2650 v3 896
i7-13700K 2862
+219%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2650 v3 5416
i7-13700K 17820
+229%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.42 29.19
Recency 8 September 2014 27 September 2022
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 24
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v3 has 19% lower power consumption.

i7-13700K, on the other hand, has a 293.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 60% more physical cores and 20% more threads.

The Core i7-13700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2650 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-13700K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i7-13700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Intel Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1175 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1395 votes

Rate Core i7-13700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v3 or Core i7-13700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.