i3-N300 vs Xeon E5-2650 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v3
2014
10 cores / 20 threads, 105 Watt
7.43
+36.8%
Core i3-N300
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 7 Watt
5.43

Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i3-N300 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9721156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency6.7073.41
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed2.3 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per module)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature79 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
GPIOno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size768 GB16 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes409
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v3 7.43
+36.8%
i3-N300 5.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v3 11797
+36.7%
i3-N300 8630

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.43 5.43
Recency 8 September 2014 3 January 2023
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 8
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 7 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v3 has a 36.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 25% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

i3-N300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-N300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-N300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v3 and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1168 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 76 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v3 or Core i3-N300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.