Athlon II M340 vs Xeon E5-2643 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2643 v2
2013
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
5.89
+1033%
Athlon II M340
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52

Xeon E5-2643 v2 outperforms Athlon II M340 by a whopping 1033% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Athlon II M340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11172869
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.61no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon II
Power efficiency4.211.38
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Caspian (2009)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,200no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Athlon II M340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s3200 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache15 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Athlon II M340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011Socket S1 (S1g3)
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Athlon II M340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Athlon II M340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Athlon II M340 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Athlon II M340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Athlon II M340.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2643 v2 5.89
+1033%
Athlon II M340 0.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2643 v2 9184
+1038%
Athlon II M340 807

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.89 0.52
Recency 1 September 2013 10 September 2009
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2643 v2 has a 1032.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II M340, on the other hand, has 271.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2643 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II M340 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2643 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II M340 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2643 v2 and Athlon II M340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2
Xeon E5-2643 v2
AMD Athlon II M340
Athlon II M340

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 85 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2643 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Athlon II M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2643 v2 or Athlon II M340, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.