Xeon Silver 4116T vs E5-2640

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.96
Xeon Silver 4116T
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.56
+141%

Xeon Silver 4116T outperforms Xeon E5-2640 by a whopping 141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon Silver 4116T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1425791
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.66no data
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency3.9410.64
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon Silver 4116T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1224
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C91 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon Silver 4116T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon Silver 4116T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon Silver 4116T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon Silver 4116T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon Silver 4116T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size384 GB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon Silver 4116T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 3.96
Xeon Silver 4116T 9.56
+141%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 6294
Xeon Silver 4116T 15187
+141%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.96 9.56
Recency 6 March 2012 11 July 2017
Physical cores 6 12
Threads 12 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon Silver 4116T has a 141.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 11.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4116T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Xeon Silver 4116T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
Intel Xeon Silver 4116T
Xeon Silver 4116T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1096 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4116T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Xeon Silver 4116T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.