Xeon X3320 vs E5-2640 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 90 Watt
8.01
+531%

Xeon E5-2640 v4 outperforms Xeon X3320 by a whopping 531% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon X3320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9422296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.70no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.271.24
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$939no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon X3320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)no data
Threads20no data
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L2 cache2.5 MBno data
L3 cache25 MB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature76 °C71 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon X3320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon X3320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon X3320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon X3320 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon X3320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon X3320.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 8.01
+531%
Xeon X3320 1.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 12488
+529%
Xeon X3320 1986

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.01 1.27
Recency 20 June 2016 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has a 530.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 5.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Xeon X3320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Xeon E5-2640 v4
Intel Xeon X3320
Xeon X3320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 933 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v4 or Xeon X3320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.