A4-3300M vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 90 Watt
8.16
+960%

Xeon E5-2640 v4 outperforms A4-3300M by a whopping 960% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v4 and A4-3300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9402650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.73no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD A-Series
Power efficiency8.272.01
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$939no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and A4-3300M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads202
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246.24 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and A4-3300M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FS1
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and A4-3300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX23DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and A4-3300M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and A4-3300M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and A4-3300M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6480G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and A4-3300M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 8.16
+960%
A4-3300M 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 12488
+953%
A4-3300M 1186

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 1048
+360%
A4-3300M 228

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 5650
+1341%
A4-3300M 392

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.16 0.77
Recency 20 June 2016 14 June 2011
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has a 959.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

A4-3300M, on the other hand, has 157.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v4 is a server/workstation processor while A4-3300M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and A4-3300M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Xeon E5-2640 v4
AMD A4-3300M
A4-3300M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 915 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 110 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v4 or A4-3300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.