Ryzen 3 3200U vs Xeon E5-2640 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
6.99
+194%
Ryzen 3 3200U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.38

Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 3 3200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10101792
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency7.3515.01
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Picasso-U (Zen) (2019)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 3 3200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die size356 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 3 3200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FP5
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 3 3200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 3 3200U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 3 3200U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 3 3200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 3 3200U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v3 6.99
+194%
Ryzen 3 3200U 2.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v3 11108
+194%
Ryzen 3 3200U 3782

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v3 1053
+34.5%
Ryzen 3 3200U 783

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v3 5474
+264%
Ryzen 3 3200U 1504

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.99 2.38
Recency 8 September 2014 6 January 2019
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v3 has a 193.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen 3 3200U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 83.3% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3200U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3200U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Ryzen 3 3200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
Xeon E5-2640 v3
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Ryzen 3 3200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2759 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1465 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v3 or Ryzen 3 3200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.