EPYC 7282 vs Xeon E5-2640 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.78
EPYC 7282
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
19.18
+301%

EPYC 7282 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 by a whopping 301% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7282 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1260303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.2915.30
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.7615.13
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$728$650

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7282 has 1086% better value for money than Xeon E5-2640 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size160 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011TR4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7282 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7282 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7282.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 4.78
EPYC 7282 19.18
+301%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 7590
EPYC 7282 30474
+302%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 395
EPYC 7282 1084
+174%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 2377
EPYC 7282 7960
+235%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.78 19.18
Recency 1 September 2013 7 August 2019
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v2 has 26.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7282, on the other hand, has a 301.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7282 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v2 and EPYC 7282, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
Xeon E5-2640 v2
AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 359 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 50 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v2 or EPYC 7282, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.