Xeon E5-2603 v2 vs E5-2630 v2

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2630 v2 and Xeon E5-2603 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1279	2049
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.64	0.47
Market segment	Server	Server
Power efficiency	5.57	2.03
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Release date	1 September 2013 (11 years ago)	1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$250	$240

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2630 v2 has 674% better value for money than Xeon E5-2603 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2630 v2 and Xeon E5-2603 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	12	4
Base clock speed	2.6 GHz	1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.1 GHz	1.8 GHz
Bus rate	7.2 GT/s	6.4 GT/s
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	15 MB (shared)	10 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	22 nm
Die size	160 mm2	160 mm2
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	71 °C
Number of transistors	1,400 million	1,400 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2630 v2 and Xeon E5-2603 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	2
Socket	FCLGA2011	FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2630 v2 and Xeon E5-2603 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX	Intel® AVX
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	-	-
Demand Based Switching	+	+
PAE	46 Bit	46 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2630 v2 and Xeon E5-2603 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	+
OS Guard	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2630 v2 and Xeon E5-2603 v2 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2630 v2 and Xeon E5-2603 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	768 GB	768 GB
Max memory channels	4	4
Maximum memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	42.6 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2630 v2 and Xeon E5-2603 v2.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	40	40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.71	1.72
Physical cores	6	4
Threads	12	4

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2630 v2 and Xeon E5-2603 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---