FX-8140 vs Xeon E5-2623 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2623 v3
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 105 Watt
4.28
+39.9%
FX-8140
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.06

Xeon E5-2623 v3 outperforms FX-8140 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2623 v3 and FX-8140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13641625
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.863.05
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2623 v3 and FX-8140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2623 v3 and FX-8140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2623 v3 and FX-8140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2623 v3 and FX-8140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2623 v3 and FX-8140 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2623 v3 and FX-8140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2623 v3 and FX-8140.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2623 v3 4.28
+39.9%
FX-8140 3.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2623 v3 6793
+39.8%
FX-8140 4860

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.28 3.06
Recency 8 September 2014 23 October 2012
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2623 v3 has a 39.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

FX-8140, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 10.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2623 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8140 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2623 v3 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8140 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2623 v3 and FX-8140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3
Xeon E5-2623 v3
AMD FX-8140
FX-8140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 41 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2623 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 51 vote

Rate FX-8140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2623 v3 or FX-8140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.