Pentium G840 vs Xeon E5-2620

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.39
+319%
Pentium G840
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.81

Xeon E5-2620 outperforms Pentium G840 by a whopping 319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15722604
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.734.61
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.311.16
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)22 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium G840 has 166% better value for money than Xeon E5-2620.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C69 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 3.39
+319%
Pentium G840 0.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 5291
+319%
Pentium G840 1264

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2620 405
Pentium G840 452
+11.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2620 1960
+148%
Pentium G840 789

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.39 0.81
Recency 6 March 2012 22 May 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 has a 318.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Pentium G840, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G840 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2620 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium G840 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 and Pentium G840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620
Xeon E5-2620
Intel Pentium G840
Pentium G840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 515 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 192 votes

Rate Pentium G840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 or Pentium G840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.