EPYC 73F3 vs Xeon E5-2620

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC 73F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1572	153
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.73	6.26
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	no data	AMD EPYC
Power efficiency	3.31	11.45
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)	Milan (2021−2023)
Release date	6 March 2012 (12 years ago)	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$36	$3,521

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 73F3 has 262% better value for money than Xeon E5-2620.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC 73F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads	12	32
Base clock speed	2 GHz	3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.5 GHz	4 GHz
Bus rate	7.2 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	no data	35
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	1 MB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	8 MB
L3 cache	15360 KB (shared)	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	7 nm+
Die size	435 mm2	8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature	77 °C	no data
Number of transistors	2,270 million	33,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC 73F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	2
Socket	FCLGA2011	SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC 73F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC 73F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC 73F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC 73F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	384 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	4	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	42.6 GB/s	204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC 73F3.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	40	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	3.39	29.58
Recency	6 March 2012	12 January 2021
Physical cores	6	16
Threads	12	32
Chip lithography	32 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	240 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 and EPYC 73F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---