Opteron 6272 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.82
+76.4%
Opteron 6272
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.30

Xeon E5-2620 v4 outperforms Opteron 6272 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Opteron 6272 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11151580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.361.35
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency6.482.72
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)14 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$325

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 149% better value for money than Opteron 6272.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Opteron 6272 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data768 KB (shared)
L2 cache2 MB8.00391 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246.24 mm2316 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Opteron 6272 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2011G34
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Opteron 6272. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Opteron 6272 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Opteron 6272 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Opteron 6272. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Opteron 6272.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 5.82
+76.4%
Opteron 6272 3.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 9248
+76.5%
Opteron 6272 5240

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.82 3.30
Recency 20 June 2016 14 November 2011
Physical cores 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 115 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 v4 has a 76.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 35.3% lower power consumption.

Opteron 6272, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6272 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Opteron 6272, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2620 v4
AMD Opteron 6272
Opteron 6272

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 98 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Opteron 6272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v4 or Opteron 6272, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.