E2-3800 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v3
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 85 Watt
5.10
+580%

Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms E2-3800 by a whopping 580% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12252670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency5.474.56
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache15 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size356 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FT3
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8280
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 5.10
+580%
E2-3800 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 7807
+578%
E2-3800 1152

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 952
+600%
E2-3800 136

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2620 v3 4133
+962%
E2-3800 389

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.10 0.75
Recency 8 September 2014 23 May 2013
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 v3 has a 580% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

E2-3800, on the other hand, has 466.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2620 v3 is a server/workstation processor while E2-3800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v3 and E2-3800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Xeon E5-2620 v3
AMD E2-3800
E2-3800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2706 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 104 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v3 or E2-3800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.