Xeon E-2488 vs E5-2618L v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2618L v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 75 Watt
7.97
Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.64
+134%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Xeon E5-2618L v4 by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking945324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.2274.75
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency9.8718.22
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$779$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2488 has 2221% better value for money than Xeon E5-2618L v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s16 GT/s
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246.24 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1,536 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 7.97
Xeon E-2488 18.64
+134%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 12429
Xeon E-2488 29060
+134%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.97 18.64
Recency 20 June 2016 14 December 2023
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2488, on the other hand, has a 133.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 years.

The Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2618L v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2618L v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2618L v4
Xeon E5-2618L v4
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2618L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2618L v4 or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.