Atom E680 vs Xeon E5-2618L v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2618L v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 75 Watt
7.82
+3455%
Atom E680
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.22

Xeon E5-2618L v4 outperforms Atom E680 by a whopping 3455% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom E680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9603202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.28no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency9.865.20
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Tunnel Creek (2010)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)14 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$779no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom E680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads202
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size246.24 mm226 mm2
Number of transistors3200 Million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom E680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 676
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom E680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom E680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom E680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom E680.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 7.82
+3455%
Atom E680 0.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 12429
+3492%
Atom E680 346

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.82 0.22
Recency 20 June 2016 14 September 2010
Physical cores 10 1
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 4 Watt

Xeon E5-2618L v4 has a 3454.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom E680, on the other hand, has 1775% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E680 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2618L v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Atom E680 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Atom E680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2618L v4
Xeon E5-2618L v4
Intel Atom E680
Atom E680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2618L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2618L v4 or Atom E680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.