i7-3770 vs Xeon E5-2608L V3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2608L V3
2014
6 cores / 6 threads, 52 Watt
4.04
Core i7-3770
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.04

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14041405
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.61
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.354.97
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)29 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size356 mm2160 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data67 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011-3FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)52 Watt77 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2608L V3 4.04
i7-3770 4.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2608L V3 6415
+0%
i7-3770 6412

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 September 2014 29 April 2012
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Power consumption (TDP) 52 Watt 77 Watt

Xeon E5-2608L V3 has an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores, and 48.1% lower power consumption.

i7-3770, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2608L V3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-3770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2608L V3
Xeon E5-2608L V3
Intel Core i7-3770
Core i7-3770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2608L V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7156 votes

Rate Core i7-3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2608L V3 or Core i7-3770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.