Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs Xeon E5 1680 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5 1680 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
8.95
+209%
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 136 Watt
2.90

Xeon E5 1680 v4 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9770 by a whopping 209% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8541656
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.90no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency6.052.02
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/s1600 MHz
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)12 MB (shared)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size246.24 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C55 °C
Number of transistors3,400 million820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt136 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.95 2.90
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 136 Watt

Xeon E5 1680 v4 has a 208.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770, on the other hand, has 2.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5 1680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5 1680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 67 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 241 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5 1680 v4 or Core 2 Extreme QX9770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.