Opteron 6278 vs Xeon E5-1660 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1660 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
8.61
Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.68
+0.8%

Opteron 6278 outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v4 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking874869
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.70no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency5.807.11
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,113no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache2 MB16 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246.24 mm2316 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4
SocketFCLGA2011G34
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1660 v4 8.61
Opteron 6278 8.68
+0.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1660 v4 13623
Opteron 6278 13733
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.61 8.68
Recency 20 June 2016 1 May 2012
Physical cores 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 115 Watt

Xeon E5-1660 v4 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 6278, on the other hand, has a 0.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, and 21.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1660 v4 and Opteron 6278, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
Xeon E5-1660 v4
AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 182 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1660 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 12 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1660 v4 or Opteron 6278, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.