Pentium Dual T2080 vs Xeon E5-1650

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1650
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
5.11
+2333%
Pentium Dual Core T2080
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.21

Xeon E5-1650 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T2080 by a whopping 2333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12033195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.14no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataPentium Dual Core
Power efficiency3.720.64
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$175no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature64 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Pentium Dual Core T2080. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Pentium Dual Core T2080 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Pentium Dual Core T2080. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Pentium Dual Core T2080.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1650 5.11
+2333%
Pentium Dual T2080 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1650 8113
+2279%
Pentium Dual T2080 341

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.11 0.21
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 31 Watt

Xeon E5-1650 has a 2333.3% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium Dual T2080, on the other hand, has 319.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T2080 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1650 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Dual Core T2080 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 and Pentium Dual Core T2080, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1650
Xeon E5-1650
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2080
Pentium Dual Core T2080

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 503 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 24 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T2080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1650 or Pentium Dual Core T2080, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.