Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs E5-1650 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1650 v4
2016
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
7.20
Xeon E5-2650L v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
7.48
+3.9%

Xeon E5-2650L v3 outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking994974
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.50no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency4.8410.83
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$617no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1224
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/s9.6 GT/s
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size246.24 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data64 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access--
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size1.5 TB768 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1650 v4 7.20
Xeon E5-2650L v3 7.48
+3.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1650 v4 11435
Xeon E5-2650L v3 11880
+3.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.20 7.48
Recency 20 June 2016 8 September 2014
Physical cores 6 12
Threads 12 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-1650 v4 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2650L v3, on the other hand, has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Xeon E5-2650L v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3
Xeon E5-2650L v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 464 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 69 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1650 v4 or Xeon E5-2650L v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.