Xeon E5-2658 vs E5-1650 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1650 v2
2013
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
5.87
+53.7%
Xeon E5-2658
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
3.82

Xeon E5-1650 v2 outperforms Xeon E5-2658 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-2658 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11041460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.490.38
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.273.81
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$917$1,462

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-1650 v2 has 292% better value for money than Xeon E5-2658.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-2658 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)20480 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-2658 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA20112011
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-2658. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-2658 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-2658 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-2658. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-2658.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1650 v2 5.87
+53.7%
Xeon E5-2658 3.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1650 v2 9324
+53.5%
Xeon E5-2658 6073

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.87 3.82
Recency 1 September 2013 6 March 2012
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-1650 v2 has a 53.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2658, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1650 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2658 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-2658, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2658
Xeon E5-2658

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 483 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1650 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1650 v2 or Xeon E5-2658, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.