Xeon X5670 vs E5-1620 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620 v4
2016
4 cores / 8 threads, 140 Watt
4.67
+21%
Xeon X5670
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.86

Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Xeon X5670 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon X5670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12771453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.851.06
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Xeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency3.143.83
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-1620 v4 has 169% better value for money than Xeon X5670.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon X5670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/s6400 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246.24 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon X5670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon X5670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit40 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon X5670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon X5670 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon X5670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB288 GB
Max memory channels43
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s32 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon X5670.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 v4 4.67
+21%
Xeon X5670 3.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 v4 7386
+21%
Xeon X5670 6105

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-1620 v4 1117
+127%
Xeon X5670 492

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-1620 v4 4016
+77.1%
Xeon X5670 2268

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.67 3.86
Recency 20 June 2016 16 March 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 v4 has a 21% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X5670, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 47.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon X5670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 47 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 474 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v4 or Xeon X5670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.