Xeon E-2436 vs E5-1620 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620 v2
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
4.12
Xeon E-2436
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.16
+244%

Xeon E-2436 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 by a whopping 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1399517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.2098.50
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.0020.60
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$315$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2436 has 4377% better value for money than Xeon E5-1620 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size160 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size256 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 4.12
Xeon E-2436 14.16
+244%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 6547
Xeon E-2436 22487
+243%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.12 14.16
Recency 1 September 2013 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2436 has a 243.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2436 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1620 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 114 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v2 or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.