Ryzen 3 3300 vs Xeon E5-1620 v2

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.20no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.00no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$315no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads8no data
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 50 Watt

Ryzen 3 3300 has 50% more physical cores, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Ryzen 3 3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Xeon E5-1620 v2
AMD Ryzen 3 3300
Ryzen 3 3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 112 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 32 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v2 or Ryzen 3 3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.