Ultra 7 256V vs Xeon E5-1607 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1607 v4
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 140 Watt
3.27
Core Ultra 7 256V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.16
+272%

Core Ultra 7 256V outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v4 by a whopping 272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1585632
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency2.2167.69
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/s37 MHz
Multiplier38no data
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011-3Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1607 v4 3.27
Ultra 7 256V 12.16
+272%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1607 v4 5199
Ultra 7 256V 19320
+272%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.27 12.16
Recency 20 June 2016 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 256V has a 271.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 723.5% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 256V is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1607 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1607 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 256V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1607 v4 and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1607 v4
Xeon E5-1607 v4
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1607 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1607 v4 or Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.