Xeon E-2436 vs E5-1603

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1603
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.18
Xeon E-2436
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.16
+550%

Xeon E-2436 outperforms Xeon E5-1603 by a whopping 550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1837512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data98.37
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.5920.62
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.6V - 1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size375 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth31.4 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1603 2.18
Xeon E-2436 14.16
+550%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1603 3463
Xeon E-2436 22487
+549%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.18 14.16
Recency 1 January 2012 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2436 has a 549.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2436 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1603 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1603 and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1603
Xeon E5-1603
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1603 or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.