EPYC 7773X vs Xeon E3110

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3110
2008
65 Watt
0.82
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.60
+6924%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon E3110 by a whopping 6924% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking260321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.1919.47
Architecture codenameno dataMilan-X (2022)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threadsno data128
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA775SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3110 0.82
EPYC 7773X 57.60
+6924%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3110 1295
EPYC 7773X 91491
+6965%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3110 388
EPYC 7773X 1531
+295%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3110 648
EPYC 7773X 15277
+2258%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 57.60
Recency 1 January 2008 22 March 2022
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon E3110 has 330.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 6924.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3110 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3110
Xeon E3110
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 38 votes

Rate Xeon E3110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3110 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.