Ryzen 7 9700X vs Xeon E3-1578L v5
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 221 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 53.52 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon E3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 34.04 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake-H (2015−2016) | Granite Ridge (2024) |
| Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 8 August 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $359 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 171 mm2 | 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,300 million | 8,315 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1440 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 5.25 | 1.98 |
| Recency | 31 May 2016 | 8 August 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon E3-1578L v5 has 165.2% faster integrated GPU, and 44.4% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 9700X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E3-1578L v5 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 9700X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1578L v5 and Ryzen 7 9700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
