i7-11370H vs Xeon E3-1505M v6
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-11370H outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v6 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1265 | 974 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.74 | no data |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon E3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.89 | 24.88 |
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $623 | $426 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Die size | no data | 146.1 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1449,FCLGA1449 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| My WiFi | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Smart Response | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | - |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics P630 | Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics |
| Max video memory | 1.7 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | 1.35 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 96 |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 4 |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@30Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 7680x4320@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.79 | 7.50 |
| Recency | 3 January 2017 | 11 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 28 Watt |
i7-11370H has a 56.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 60.7% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-11370H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1505M v6 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E3-1505M v6 is a mobile workstation processor while Core i7-11370H is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1505M v6 and Core i7-11370H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
