i9-13900K vs Xeon E3-1285 v6

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1285 v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 79 Watt
5.51
Core i9-13900K
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.15
+574%

Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E3-1285 v6 by a whopping 574% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking115089
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.5359.82
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Core i9
Power efficiency6.6013.90
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-DT (2017)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date1 August 2017 (7 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900K has 982% better value for money than Xeon E3-1285 v6.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed4.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier4130
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size160 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketLGA-1151FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)79 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics P630Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@24Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1285 v6 5.51
i9-13900K 37.15
+574%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1285 v6 8751
i9-13900K 59003
+574%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.51 37.15
Integrated graphics card 3.11 6.15
Recency 1 August 2017 27 September 2022
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 79 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E3-1285 v6 has 58.2% lower power consumption.

i9-13900K, on the other hand, has a 574.2% higher aggregate performance score, 97.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, and 500% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Core i9-13900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1285 v6 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1285 v6 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1285 v6 and Core i9-13900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1285 v6
Xeon E3-1285 v6
Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1926 votes

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1285 v6 or Core i9-13900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.