Xeon W3540 vs E3-1285 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1285 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 84 Watt
4.47
+125%
Xeon W3540
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.99

Xeon E3-1285 v3 outperforms Xeon W3540 by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13381935
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.18
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.941.42
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)30 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB24 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4600N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1285 v3 4.47
+125%
Xeon W3540 1.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1285 v3 6974
+124%
Xeon W3540 3109

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.47 1.99
Recency 2 June 2013 30 March 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon E3-1285 v3 has a 124.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 54.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1285 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon W3540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1285 v3
Xeon E3-1285 v3
Intel Xeon W3540
Xeon W3540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 14 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon W3540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1285 v3 or Xeon W3540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.