Z-01 vs Xeon E3-1280 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1276not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency5.37no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Desna (2011)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$800no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm40 nm
Die size160 mm275 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FT1
Power consumption (TDP)82 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A, AMD-V
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6250

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1280 v3 7393
+2324%
Z-01 305

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2013 1 June 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 82 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E3-1280 v3 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 81.8% more advanced lithography process.

Z-01, on the other hand, has 1266.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1280 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Z-01 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Z-01, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
Xeon E3-1280 v3
AMD Z-01
Z-01

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 42 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 11 votes

Rate Z-01 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 v3 or Z-01, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.