Xeon W-2104 vs E3-1270 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1270 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.59
+32.3%
Xeon W-2104
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
3.47

Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Xeon W-2104 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Xeon W-2104 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12941538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.185.34
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency5.412.73
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)29 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$370$255

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-2104 has 145% better value for money than Xeon E3-1270 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Xeon W-2104 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)8.25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2484 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data66 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Xeon W-2104 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Xeon W-2104. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+-
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Xeon W-2104 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno data-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Xeon W-2104 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Xeon W-2104. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size32 GB512 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Xeon W-2104.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1270 v3 4.59
+32.3%
Xeon W-2104 3.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1270 v3 7268
+32.3%
Xeon W-2104 5495

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.59 3.47
Recency 2 June 2013 29 August 2017
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon E3-1270 v3 has a 32.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-2104, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E3-1270 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2104 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 v3 and Xeon W-2104, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Intel Xeon W-2104
Xeon W-2104

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1261 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-2104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1270 v3 or Xeon W-2104, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.