A6-9500 vs Xeon E3-1270 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1270 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.58
+288%
A6-9500
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.18

Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms A6-9500 by a whopping 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12962355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.322.62
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.421.72
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$370$64

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A6-9500 has 13% better value for money than Xeon E3-1270 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size160 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150AM4
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1270 v3 4.58
+288%
A6-9500 1.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1270 v3 7268
+289%
A6-9500 1869

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1270 v3 1226
+95.5%
A6-9500 627

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1270 v3 3895
+309%
A6-9500 953

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.58 1.18
Recency 2 June 2013 27 July 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1270 v3 has a 288.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1270 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1270 v3 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 v3 and A6-9500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
Xeon E3-1270 v3
AMD A6-9500
A6-9500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1276 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 185 votes

Rate A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1270 v3 or A6-9500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.