Xeon W-3223 vs E3-1260L v5

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1260L v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.18
Xeon W-3223
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
10.70
+107%

Xeon W-3223 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1190726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.5718.63
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency10.896.33
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3223 has 422% better value for money than Xeon E3-1260L v5.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2935
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Number of transistors1,750 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size64 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1260L v5 5.18
Xeon W-3223 10.70
+107%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1260L v5 8226
Xeon W-3223 17003
+107%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1260L v5 1291
Xeon W-3223 1371
+6.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1260L v5 4100
Xeon W-3223 8125
+98.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.18 10.70
Recency 19 October 2015 3 June 2019
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 160 Watt

Xeon E3-1260L v5 has 255.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3223, on the other hand, has a 106.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon W-3223 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1260L v5 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1260L v5 and Xeon W-3223, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Xeon E3-1260L v5
Intel Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 48 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1260L v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3223 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1260L v5 or Xeon W-3223, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.