Celeron J1900 vs Xeon E3-1240L v5

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240L v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
4.10
+469%
Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72

Xeon E3-1240L v5 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 469% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14072698
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.46no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency15.526.81
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$278$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.42 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,750 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240L v5 4.10
+469%
Celeron J1900 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240L v5 6511
+467%
Celeron J1900 1149

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240L v5 1103
+538%
Celeron J1900 173

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240L v5 3524
+582%
Celeron J1900 517

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.10 0.72
Recency 19 October 2015 1 November 2013
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E3-1240L v5 has a 469.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J1900, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1240L v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240L v5 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240L v5 and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240L v5
Xeon E3-1240L v5
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240L v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 197 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240L v5 or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.